Preview
Copywork
About This Passage
This passage is the chapter's emotional pivot and its most important piece of textual craft. First, it completes a cycle Sachar has been setting up since Chapter 3 — the epithet 'no-good-dirty-rotten' (Elya Yelnats's family curse on his great-great-grandfather for failing to carry Madame Zeroni up the mountain) now lands, in Texas, on Stanley himself, and lands from the mouth of his hero. The curse is no longer a joke Stanley's father makes about weather; it is an active social verdict delivered under oath. Second, Sachar refuses to dramatize Stanley's pain. The chapter could have given us a paragraph of Stanley's tears; it gives us one clinical sentence ('His hero thought he was a no-good-dirty-rotten thief') and walks away. The trust in the reader — to feel what the chapter is not going to describe — is itself a moral stance, because it mirrors how a boy actually experiences this kind of betrayal: not as a paragraph, but as a sentence he will replay forever.
Clyde Livingston testified that they were his sneakers and that he had donated them to help raise money for the homeless shelter. He said he couldn't imagine what kind of horrible person would steal f...
Full copywork activity with handwriting lines available in the complete study guide.
Discussion Questions
Narration Prompt
Retell Chapter 6 in five or six sentences, attending to the chapter's nested time structure. Stanley is lying awake in a cot that smells of sour milk; his mind moves backward through the D-tent dinner conversation about his crime, through Clyde Livingston's courtroom testimony, through the arrest under the freeway overpass, through Derrick Dunne's notebook-in-the-toilet, to the judge's closing line about 'vacancies.' Include the key reversal at the chapter's center — Stanley's interpretation of the falling shoes flipping from 'destiny' to 'his no-good-dirty-rotten-pig-stealing-great-great-grandfather.'
Discussion Questions
- The chapter's most important single sentence may be Stanley's realization: 'Nobody had believed him when he said he was innocent. Now, when he said he stole them, nobody believed him either.' Analyze this as Sachar's compressed thesis about the relationship between truth and belief in this novel. What is Stanley finally understanding about the world he lives in?
- Stanley first reads the falling sneakers as 'destiny' — 'like a gift from God,' a sign that the shoes will solve his father's recycling invention. By the end of the chapter he has reinterpreted the event as a curse — 'It wasn't destiny. It was his no-good-dirty-rotten-pig-stealing-great-great-grandfather!' The event is identical; only the frame has changed. What does the reframing tell us about how Stanley now understands his life, and how is this connected to his father's family's hundred-ten-year habit of blaming the ancestor?
+ 3 more questions in the complete study guide
Vocabulary Builder
Item 1
Gave formal statements in a legal setting, under oath, as evidence about what the speaker claims to have observed or done; Clyde Livingston did this against Stanley in court.
Item 2
Gave away as a gift, typically to a charitable cause; the sneakers were this (by Clyde) before they were stolen from the display.
Item 3
Lacking a place to live; the chapter uses this word to describe both the shelter's beneficiaries and — significantly — Clyde Livingston's own childhood.
+ 5 more vocabulary words in the complete study guide
Critical Thinking
+ 6 more questions in the complete study guide
Get the complete study guide — free
Sign up and get your first book with every chapter included. Copywork, discussion questions, vocabulary, and critical thinking.
Sign up free