Print at 100% scale on letter paper, with no added margins.
Frankenstein
Mountaineers · 10th–12th
Is the stranger warning Walton against seeking knowledge, or against seeking it at any price?
The tension What Walton calls “the burning ardour of my soul” his listener calls madness: when Walton says “One man’s life or death were but a small price to pay for the acquirement of the knowledge which I sought,” the stranger weeps behind his hands and asks, “Do you share my madness?”
What the letters show their writer wanting, from the voyage and from a friend, and what the half-frozen man he takes aboard makes of those wants.
Four letters from Captain Walton to his sister Margaret, written as he sails north. From St. Petersburgh he dreams of a polar land of light and asks whether he does not deserve to succeed. From Archangel he admits he has no friend. At sea he promises to be prudent, then cries that nothing can stop the will of man. In the last letter the crew sees a gigantic figure on a sledge, then takes in a half-frozen man from a second sledge. Walton comes to love his guest. When Walton speaks of the price he would pay for knowledge, the stranger weeps, and later he agrees to tell his history.
Read aloud the opening of the second paragraph of the first letter, through “Do you understand this feeling?” Ask the student what answer Walton hopes his sister will give.
Retell The student retells the four letters in order and says where Walton is for each one: St. Petersburgh, Archangel, at sea, and in the ice.
Imitate the author After copying the passage, the student writes a long sentence that keeps adding one thing after another, then a short sentence that stops it, about a hope of their own.
Debate The student argues one side of the closing written question, then switches and argues the other, using the stranger’s own words each time.
Purpose Close by asking why the book gives the reader the listener before it gives the teller, and what a reader does with that.
Easier Read the last letter aloud together, from the first sledge to the stranger’s promise to tell his history, then talk through discussion questions 4 and 5 only.
On level Talk through all five discussion questions, then have the student complete both written questions, each as a thesis, an objection, and a revision.
Harder Ask the student to set the stranger’s “nothing can alter my destiny” beside his hope that his tale may “direct” Walton, and to say whether one man can hold both beliefs.
1. Walton tries “in vain to be persuaded that the pole is the seat of frost and desolation.” Yet he will “put some trust in preceding navigators.” Is he weighing the evidence, or has he already decided?Inference
What it asks It asks whether Walton’s trust in earlier sailors is a way of weighing what is known or a way of finding support for a hope he already holds. The pole is the first thing he wants to know, so how he treats evidence about it shows what he counts as knowing.
He is weighing the evidence: he asks leave to trust the navigators, calls his own hopes “conjectures,” and builds a second reason for going in case they fail.
I will put some trust in preceding navigators
But supposing all these conjectures to be false
He has already decided: he cannot be argued out of the picture, and the pole “ever presents itself” to him as beauty and delight whatever he reads.
I try in vain to be persuaded that the pole is the seat of frost and desolation
it ever presents itself to my imagination as the region of beauty and delight
A strong answer A strong answer might notice that Walton asks his sister’s leave to trust the navigators, and that the pole he goes on to describe, where “snow and frost are banished,” is the one he already pictures. It might argue that he is weighing, since he calls his own hopes “conjectures” and offers a second reason for the voyage. Or it might argue that he has decided, since “in vain” says no argument can move him, and the second reason would carry him north even if the first failed. The more convincing answer says which of his words shows the doubt and which shows the will to go on.
2. Walton wants a friend whose “tastes are like my own” and who can “amend my plans.” What would a friend have to be like to do both?Theme
What it asks It asks what kind of friend could both share Walton’s tastes and correct his plans. The two pull apart, since a friend who loves what he loves may only cheer him on. The letters hold two answers, Walton’s own and the stranger’s.
Walton’s answer: the friend must stand beside him. Only someone who will not “despise me as romantic” can win the trust to “regulate my mind,” and it is affection, not likeness alone, that earns the right to correct.
I greatly need a friend who would have sense enough not to despise me as romantic
affection enough for me to endeavour to regulate my mind
The stranger’s answer: the friend must stand a step above him, “wiser, better, dearer than ourselves.” The stranger speaks as one who has had such a friend and judges by it.
if one wiser, better, dearer than ourselves—such a friend ought to be—do not lend his aid to perfectionate our weak and faulty natures
I once had a friend, the most noble of human creatures
A strong answer A strong answer might start with the pull inside Walton’s wish: a friend whose tastes match his may only cheer him on. Walton gives his own answer in the same letter, a friend with “sense enough not to despise me as romantic, and affection enough” to “regulate my mind,” so love, more than likeness, earns the right to correct. Another answer starts from the stranger, who says a friend ought to be “wiser, better, dearer than ourselves.” On that view the friend who can amend Walton’s plans must stand ahead of him, not beside him. The best answers say whether the two pictures could fit one person, and what each asks of the friend who has to tell Walton no.
3. Walton promises his sister, “I will be cool, persevering, and prudent.” A few lines later he asks, “What can stop the determined heart and resolved will of man?” Then he admits, “My swelling heart involuntarily pours itself out thus.” Does that admission make his promise easier to trust, or harder?Moral reasoning
What it asks It asks the student to weigh a promise of prudence against the voice that follows it, and to decide what the writer’s own admission does to the promise. His sister can judge only by his words, so the words are the whole case.
It makes the promise easier to trust: he sees his heart running ahead and says so, he reports the voyage so far in a plain, cool way, and from Archangel he had already promised, “I shall do nothing rashly,” and said he could not bear “the usual brutality exercised on board ship.”
My swelling heart involuntarily pours itself out thus.
I shall be well content if nothing worse happen to us during our voyage.
I shall do nothing rashly: you know me sufficiently to confide in my prudence and considerateness whenever the safety of others is committed to my care.
It makes the promise harder to trust: the swell comes within lines of the promise, and “involuntarily” says he cannot stop it.
What can stop the determined heart and resolved will of man?
the very stars themselves being witnesses and testimonies of my triumph
A strong answer A strong answer might argue that the admission helps him. A man who says his heart “involuntarily pours itself out” knows what he is like, and from Archangel he had already named “a love for the marvellous” that “hurries me out of the common pathways of men.” It might argue the opposite: “involuntarily” says he cannot help it, and “cool” means little from a man who speaks of “my triumph” before he has arrived. The strongest answers say what each reading asks of his sister, who has nothing but his words to go on.
4. The stranger weeps and cries, “Do you share my madness?” In the same speech he says, “let me reveal my tale.” Walton writes, “Such words, you may imagine, strongly excited my curiosity.” Why might the stranger’s cry make Walton curious instead of careful?Theme
What it asks It asks why a cry of pain stirs Walton’s appetite for the tale and not his caution. He never answers the stranger’s question in the letters, so what he writes next is the only evidence of how he heard it.
Walton hears a mystery, not a warning: the wish that drives the voyage, his “ardent curiosity,” is the one the stranger’s cry stirs up.
Such words, you may imagine, strongly excited my curiosity
shall satiate my ardent curiosity with the sight of a part of the world never before visited
Walton’s curiosity is partly care: he wants to know the grief that has broken a man he has begun to love, and he says he wishes to ease it.
partly from curiosity and partly from a strong desire to ameliorate his fate
I begin to love him as a brother
A strong answer A strong answer might point to the echo: Walton first used “curiosity” for what he hopes to satisfy at the pole, so the same hunger answers the stranger’s cry. It might also argue that the curiosity is partly kindness, since Walton says it is “partly from curiosity and partly from a strong desire to ameliorate his fate.” Either reading should say what the stranger’s tears have already told Walton, and what Walton chooses to write down about them.
5. The stranger once meant his history to die with him. Now he tells Walton, “you have won me to alter my determination.” What was it about Walton that won him?Character
What it asks It asks what moved the stranger from silence to speech: what Walton is, or what Walton has done. The stranger names a reason, but “won” is a word for winning a person over, so the student may find a second one.
What won him is who Walton is: a man on the same course, seeking what the stranger once sought, and heading for the same dangers.
You seek for knowledge and wisdom, as I once did
you are pursuing the same course, exposing yourself to the same dangers which have rendered me what I am
What won him is what Walton did: he rescued the stranger, nursed him and offered him friendship, and the stranger now calls him “my friend.” The word “won” is about gaining someone’s goodwill.
you have benevolently restored me to life
my friend, if thus you will allow me to name you
A strong answer A strong answer might start with the reason the stranger states: Walton is “pursuing the same course,” and the stranger hopes his tale can direct him. It might then argue that “won” points elsewhere, to the rescue and the care, since the stranger says Walton has “benevolently restored me to life” and calls him “my friend, if thus you will allow me to name you.” The best answers keep two things apart: what made the stranger willing to speak, and what he hopes the telling will do.
1. In the first letter Walton wishes for “some encouraging voice.” In the second he says, “I have no friend.” In the fourth, a stranger comes aboard, and the letters end just before he tells his story. Why might the book open with Walton and not with the stranger?
What it asks It asks what the four letters give the stranger’s history that the history could not give itself. The student builds a thesis about the book’s opening choice from Walton’s wish for a voice, his want of a friend, and the man he finds on the ice.
The letters give the stranger’s history a listener and a reason to be told: he speaks because of this particular man, and for what this man might do with it.
you have won me to alter my determination
I imagine that you may deduce an apt moral from my tale
The letters make the reader feel Walton’s hope first, so the stranger’s reply lands on a wish the reader has been asked to share.
Do you understand this feeling?
These are my enticements, and they are sufficient to conquer all fear of danger or death
A strong answer A strong thesis might say the letters give the stranger’s history a listener and a reason: he tells it to this man, for what this man might do with it. Another might say the letters make the reader feel Walton’s hope first, since Walton asks his sister, “Do you understand this feeling?” long before the stranger asks him, “Do you share my madness?” A good objection to the first is that a story can be told with no listener named. A good objection to the second is that a reader may not feel what Walton feels at all. The revision keeps what survives and stays inside what these four letters show.
2. Walton says that one man’s life or death is “a small price to pay” for the knowledge he seeks. The stranger answers with tears. Later he hopes Walton may draw a moral from his tale. Is the stranger warning Walton against seeking knowledge, or against seeking it at any price?
What it asks It asks the student to decide what the stranger fears in Walton: the seeking itself, or a price Walton would pay without counting it. The stranger’s own words leave both open, and the letters stop before Walton answers.
He is warning against seeking knowledge at all: he names Walton’s aim, “knowledge and wisdom,” as his own old aim, calls the result “a serpent” that stung him, and says the tale will make Walton “dash the cup from your lips.”
You seek for knowledge and wisdom, as I once did
the gratification of your wishes may not be a serpent to sting you, as mine has been
let me reveal my tale, and you will dash the cup from your lips!
He is warning against the price: he answers the “small price” speech with tears, and he hopes his tale may direct Walton “if you succeed” as well as console him in failure.
One man’s life or death were but a small price to pay for the acquirement of the knowledge which I sought
that may direct you if you succeed in your undertaking and console you in case of failure
A strong answer A strong thesis might argue that he warns against the price: he weeps at “a small price,” and by the last entry he hopes his tale may “direct” Walton “if you succeed” as well as console him in failure. A strong objection is his own line, “You seek for knowledge and wisdom, as I once did,” which names the seeking as what hurt him, together with his promise that the tale will make Walton “dash the cup from your lips.” The revision might then hold that he fears what a hunger for knowledge does to a man who stops counting the cost, while admitting that the letters never say which fear is his. A thesis from the other side starts with “a serpent to sting you” and has to explain why, by the last entry, he never tells Walton to turn back. Either way, the revision should change because of the objection.
One man’s life or death were but a small price to pay for the acquirement of the knowledge which I sought, for the dominion I should acquire and transmit over the elemental foes of our race.Gaining something by effort. Walton uses it for knowledge, then uses “acquire” for “dominion” in the next phrase, so the two aims sound like one kind of prize.
I was easily led by the sympathy which he evinced to use the language of my heartShowed plainly. Walton says the stranger’s sympathy led him to speak, so the word points at what the listener showed and not at what Walton felt.
I shall satiate my ardent curiosity with the sight of a part of the world never before visited, and may tread a land never before imprinted by the foot of man.To satisfy a hunger fully. Walton uses an eating word for curiosity, so the wish to see new lands sounds like an appetite.
I commenced by inuring my body to hardship.Hardening someone to a harsh thing by long exposure. Walton does it to his own body, so the word is about a cost he chose to pay himself.
Such words, you may imagine, strongly excited my curiosity; but the paroxysm of grief that had seized the stranger overcame his weakened powers, and many hours of repose and tranquil conversation were necessary to restore his composure.A sudden, violent fit of strong feeling. The word says grief took hold of the stranger like an attack, which is why he needs hours of rest afterward.
He is so gentle, yet so wise; his mind is so cultivated, and when he speaks, although his words are culled with the choicest art, yet they flow with rapidity and unparalleled eloquence.Chosen with care from many possibilities, the way flowers are picked. Walton hears the stranger’s words as selected and shaped, which tells us how the listener hears him.