Print at 100% scale on letter paper, with no added margins.
East of Eden
Mountaineers · 10th–12th
The narrator treasures the kind of glory that came to Adam, yet it keeps Adam from seeing his own wife. Is Adam’s glory a gift or a danger?
The tension In Adam’s mind Cathy is “a sweet and holy girl,” and “nothing Cathy did or said could warp Adam’s Cathy”; in the King City hotel she has nearly bled to death trying to end her pregnancy with a knitting needle, lies to Dr. Tilson about epilepsy in her family, and Adam hears only “Your wife is going to have a baby.”
The narrator says what he believes about the lonely, creating mind, then follows Adam, lit up by Cathy, as he leaves his brother, comes to the Salinas Valley, and goes to ask Samuel Hamilton about water before he buys his land.
The chapter opens in the narrator’s own voice. Sometimes a glory lights the mind of a man, he says, like a fuse burning toward dynamite; it is lonely, it relates us to the world, and it is “the mother of all creativeness”. He turns to the mass method he sees getting into our thinking, says that only the single mind creates, and states his creed: he will fight for the free mind and against any idea, religion or government that limits it. “If the glory can be killed, we are lost.” The second section turns to Adam Trask, who grew up in grayness until, through Cathy, the glory came to him. The narrator, who has called Cathy a monster, asks who has not probed the black water, and says Adam may not have seen her at all. Adam does not listen when she says she does not want to go to California, sells his share of the farm to Charles for less than it was worth, and leaves; Charles turns to his farm and becomes “rich without pleasure and respected without friends.” A railroad broadside brings the Trasks to the Salinas Valley, and Adam drives from farm to farm, talking of soil and water. One afternoon he finds Cathy in the King City hotel nearly dead from loss of blood. Upstairs, Dr. Tilson learns that she tried to end her pregnancy, hears her story of epilepsy in her family, and promises not to tell; downstairs he tells Adam his wife is going to have a baby. Adam’s attention narrows to Bordoni’s ranch, the old Sanchez grant, and he walks every foot of it. In the third section Louis Lippo drives him to Samuel Hamilton’s dry hill ranch, warning him on the way not to look down on a man without money. At the forge Samuel tells of his son Tom and his wife’s sofa, of the valley’s soil and its hard-pan, of the rich valley it could be, and then of a blackness he can feel on it. Adam shivers and goes home. After a night of struggle he shakes hands with Bordoni, and the Sanchez place is his.
Before reading, ask the student how they would test a piece of land before buying it to live on for the rest of their life, and hold the answer. Read the essay aloud and stop at “If the glory can be killed, we are lost.” to ask what the narrator would fight for. Read the second section through Charles after the train, then the railroad paragraphs. Read the hotel scene without stopping, and at “Your wife is going to have a baby.” ask what Adam knows now and what he does not. Read the Sanchez paragraphs and bring back the opening answer: set the student’s way of testing land beside Adam’s. Read the drive to the Hamiltons and the talk at the forge to the end. Come back to the essay only at the last written question.
Retell The student retells the chapter from the narrator’s glory to Adam’s handshake with Bordoni. Look for the three sections in order: the essay and its creed; Adam lit by Cathy, the parting from Charles, the broadside, the hotel and the Sanchez land; and the visit to Samuel, from Louis’s warning to the blackness. Look for the gap between what happens in the hotel room and what Adam is told downstairs, and for no claim about the birth, the baby’s father, or Cathy’s real reason. The one line the student keeps should come with a reason.
Imitate the author After copying, the student writes two short paragraphs about one person or place they care about. The first, in the first passage’s pattern, sees it through strong feeling: open with a clause that waves an objection aside, as “Whatever Cathy may have been” does, use one comparison, and turn one sentence around so the verb comes before what it describes (“so lighted was she”). The second, in the second passage’s pattern, looks at the same thing with care: open with a short sentence that turns on “But”, give each sentence after it a new verb of looking or handling, stack one series with “and”, and end on a list set off after a comma.
Debate Take sides on the last written question. One side argues that the glory is a gift and gathers the essay’s creed, the release from “fear and bitterness and rancid memories”, Adam’s care with the land, and Charles’s life without it. The other argues that it is a danger and gathers the unheard “she did not want to go”, the brother’s pain, the “noncommittal answers”, and the gap between the hotel room and the lobby. Each side must answer the other’s strongest piece. Neither may say what happens at the birth, who fathered the baby, or why Cathy really tried to end the pregnancy.
Purpose Close on the line “Perhaps Adam did not see Cathy at all, so lighted was she by his eyes.” The chapter opens with an essay in praise of the glory and then shows it at work in one man. Ask why a novel would set its narrator’s own creed beside a man whom that creed’s glory blinds. Name the habit the chapter practises: holding a thing as precious and as dangerous at once, without letting go of either.
Easier Read aloud the essay’s last paragraph, the second section from “Whatever Cathy may have been” through Charles at the station, the hotel scene, and Samuel’s talk from “I can see myself” to Adam’s leaving. Talk through the first, fourth and fifth discussion questions, then answer the last written question aloud before writing it.
On level Talk through all five discussion questions in order, then write all three written questions as a thesis, the strongest objection and a revised thesis, each with lines from the chapter.
Harder Ask for one argued essay on the narrator’s claim that “Nothing was ever created by two men.” The glory came to Adam “through Cathy”, and he means to found “a home, a family, perhaps a dynasty”. Can the lonely mind the essay praises make a home with another person? The essay should meet the objection that Samuel, the chapter’s fullest free mind, has raised a large family with Liza, and weigh what Adam’s night of struggle, alone, says about it.
1. A star shell is a flare fired over a battlefield at night. The narrator says the glory changes the world “the way a star shell changes a battleground”. What would you see by that light?Author's choice
What it asks It asks the student to look hard at the picture the narrator chooses for the glory at the moment it reaches Adam. The paragraph begins, “Whatever Cathy may have been, she set off the glory in Adam. His spirit rose flying and released him from fear and bitterness and rancid memories.” Then comes the star shell, and right after it: “Perhaps Adam did not see Cathy at all, so lighted was she by his eyes.” A star shell bursts high in the dark and hangs a hard white light over the ground below. The student says what that light would show and what it would do to the eye. It feeds the hinge: the comparison holds both halves of the question, a light that makes a dark world new and a light over a battlefield. The essay had already given the glory one explosive picture, “like a fuse burning toward dynamite”. The card must not say what Cathy will do to Adam later; the chapter does not show it.
A world made new. Under the flare the dark ground leaps into view, every shape suddenly clear and strange. That is what the essay promised: a man who has lived “in the gray” finds the whole world glowing. Adam has known only “half-sorrows and sick dissatisfactions”, and now he sees soil, tracks, oaks and a future. The light is a gift because it shows him a world he never saw.
it flashes in the brain and the whole world glows outside your eyes
His spirit rose flying and released him from fear and bitterness and rancid memories.
A battlefield, still. A flare does not end the fighting; it lights it, harsh and white, for a moment, and the shadows behind things go blacker. Anyone staring into it cannot see past it. The very next sentence says so of Adam: he may not have seen Cathy at all. The ground he sees by is still a battleground.
Perhaps Adam did not see Cathy at all, so lighted was she by his eyes.
You can feel it growing or preparing like a fuse burning toward dynamite.
A strong answer A strong response says what the light would show and what it would hide, and stands on the fourth paragraph of the second section. One reader sees a world made new: under the flare the dark ground jumps into view, as the essay promised when a man who lived “in the gray” finds the whole world glowing, and Adam is freed from fear and bitterness. Another sees a battlefield, lit but not changed, with darker shadows and a light so bright the watcher cannot see past it, which is what the next sentence says of Adam. The best answers notice that the narrator chose a picture from war for his highest joy, and carry that into the last question.
2. The narrator guesses that a man’s importance “can be measured by the quality and number of his glories.” After Adam’s train pulls out, the chapter stays one paragraph with Charles. Is that measure fair to Charles?Moral reasoning
What it asks It asks the student to test the narrator’s measure of a man on the one man the chapter shows without the glory. In the essay the narrator writes, “And I guess a man’s importance in the world can be measured by the quality and number of his glories.” In the second section Adam’s glory is so bright “that he did not notice the sullen pain in his brother, did not see the glinting in his brother’s eyes.” He sells his share of the farm to Charles “for less than it was worth” and leaves “free and rich”. The chapter then stays behind for one paragraph: Charles rubs his scar as the train pulls out, drinks four quick whiskies, goes up to the top floor of the inn, where his visit ends in tears, and then rages at his farm until “he became rich without pleasure and respected without friends.” The student decides whether the measure is fair to Charles, and what it leaves out. It feeds the hinge: the light that lifts Adam is the same light that kept him from seeing his brother’s pain, and the measure counts the glory but not what the glory fails to see. The card must not explain the scar or what lies between the brothers; this chapter tells neither. It must not say what Charles feels beyond what the page shows.
Fair. The narrator’s own words weigh Charles and find him light. He takes no rest and no pleasure; he forces his farm and his boundaries grow, but he gains nothing he enjoys and no friend. A man can be rich and respected and still count for little, and Charles shows how. Adam, lit up, leaves free; Charles, with no glory, is left with land.
He took no rest, no recreation, and he became rich without pleasure and respected without friends.
with that and his half of his father’s money he was free and rich
Not fair. The measure counts glories and leaves out pain, and Charles is full of it: he rubs his scar, drinks, and cries in a stranger’s arms until she puts him out. That pain is exactly what Adam’s glory could not see. The narrator only guesses at his measure, and then gives Charles a paragraph the measure has no room for. A light that never saw his pain is a strange scale to weigh him on.
He cried in her arms until she put him out.
And I guess a man’s importance in the world can be measured by the quality and number of his glories.
A strong answer A strong response tests the measure on Charles and stands on the essay’s first paragraph and the paragraph after the station. One reader calls it fair: by the narrator’s own words Charles becomes “rich without pleasure and respected without friends”, a man with land and no glory, while Adam leaves free. Another calls it unfair: the measure counts glories and leaves out pain, and Charles’s pain, the scar, the whiskies, the tears in a stranger’s arms, is the very thing Adam’s glory did not see. The best answers notice that the narrator only guesses at his measure, and carry the question of what the glory cannot see into the last question.
3. The narrator says it is “very easy to understand” how the Trasks came to the Salinas Valley. A railroad poster sold it to Adam as better than heaven. How much of where he settles was his own choice?Theme
What it asks It asks the student to weigh the free mind the essay praises against the forces that brought Adam to the valley. The essay has warned that “mass method is bound to get into our thinking”. Now the narrator says, “How they happened to go to the Salinas Valley is very easy to understand.” The railroads, “striving to increase and to dominate”, put out booklets and broadsides, and “the company had to create customers to get custom.” Adam studied one that set forth the valley “as that region which heaven unsuccessfully imitated.” Yet “Adam did not rush at his purchase”: he drove from farm to farm, crumbled dirt in his fingers, put an auger down through the subsoil, and knelt at the game tracks. The student weighs how much of where he settles, the valley and then the ranch, was his own choice. It feeds the hinge: the glory runs on a bright picture, and here someone else painted one. The card must not tie the essay’s attack on mass thinking to any one named country; the narrator speaks of “some nations”.
Very little. The railroad made the picture and Adam bought it. The narrator says so with a straight face: no claim was too extravagant, and anyone who did not want to settle there was crazy. Adam’s glory needs a bright picture, and here a company printed one for him, the way his own mind made a sweet and holy girl. Even Bordoni knew before Adam did.
After reading the literature, anyone who did not want to settle in the Salinas Valley was crazy.
Bordoni knew Adam was going to buy his land long before Adam knew it.
Most of it. The broadside brought him to the valley, but it did not choose his land. He asked about soil and water, climate and crops, the small wild plants, and he walked every foot. “It was not speculation with Adam.” A free mind can take a hint from an advertisement and still decide for itself.
Adam did not rush at his purchase.
He drove and rode and walked over every foot of the land.
A strong answer A strong response weighs the broadside against the testing, and stands on the railroad paragraphs and the Sanchez paragraphs. One reader says little of the choice was Adam’s: the company had to create customers, the broadside sold a heaven, and Adam, whose glory runs on a bright picture, bought one someone else painted; even Bordoni knew before he did. Another says most of it was his: the broadside brought him, but he did not rush, and he walked every foot of the land before he shook hands. The best answers notice that Bordoni knew before Adam did, and ask whether Adam’s care was a choice or the steps of a choice already made.
4. Dr. Tilson finds the knitting needle and threatens Cathy with the law. Then he promises not to tell her husband. Downstairs he tells Adam his standard joke. Who does that silence protect?Inference
What it asks It asks the student to weigh the doctor’s promise and the joke that follows it, the gap between the room upstairs and the lobby. In the room Dr. Tilson finds the knitting needle, shakes it in Cathy’s face, and tells her, “The baby is safe. Your aim was bad.” He threatens her with the law: “I will charge you, I will testify against you, and I will see you punished.” Only then “The cold went out of her eyes and a weak sadness took its place.” She gives him a reason, “I’m tainted. Epilepsy.”, and adds, “I couldn’t bring that to my husband.” His anger disappears “like mist”, he promises, “I won’t tell your husband what you did.”, and he puts the knitting needle in his pocket. Downstairs he uses “his trick, his standard joke”, and Adam hears only “Your wife is going to have a baby.” The student says whom the doctor’s silence protects, and at what cost. It feeds the hinge: the narrator says “nothing Cathy did or said could warp Adam’s Cathy”, and here the picture is kept whole by someone else’s silence, so the blindness is not Adam’s alone. The card must not say why Cathy really tried to end the pregnancy (the epilepsy story is the reason she gives the doctor, and the chapter has shown her lying before), and must not say who fathered the baby.
Cathy, and she won it. The doctor holds the needle and the law, and she says nothing until he threatens to see her punished. Only then does the cold leave her eyes and a story come out. In a few lines he goes from “You’re a fool” to “Tell me, my dear.” His silence keeps her from the law and from her husband, and it leaves Adam’s picture of her untouched.
The cold went out of her eyes and a weak sadness took its place.
All right then. I won’t tell your husband what you did.
Adam, or so the doctor believes. Tilson has just told Cathy, “You’ve got a good husband,” and she tells him she could not bring a sickness to a man “so good, so strong.” Keeping quiet spares that good man a wound and sends him running up the stairs to his wife. It is what Adam’s glory does for him, gift and danger both: he builds his home on what he is not told.
You’ve got a good husband.
Adam bolted clumsily up the narrow stairs.
A strong answer A strong response names who is protected and at what cost, and stands on the hotel pages. One reader says the silence protects Cathy, and that she won it: she says nothing until the doctor threatens to see her punished, then the cold leaves her eyes, she gives a reason, and he goes from “You’re a fool” to “Tell me, my dear.” Another says it protects Adam, the good husband both of them name, and sends him happy up the stairs. The best answers notice that the needle leaves in the doctor’s pocket and a joke stands in its place, so Adam’s picture of Cathy is kept whole by someone else’s silence, and carry that into the last question.
5. Samuel watched Tom chain the sofa Liza loves best behind two horses and drag it off up the hill. What kept him from stopping Tom?Character
What it asks It asks the student to stand inside Samuel while he tells the story of Tom and the sofa. Samuel calls Tom “a hell-bent boy” who “Pleasures too much, sorrows too much”, adds “Liza thinks I’m like that”, and says, “I don’t know what will come to Tom. Maybe greatness, maybe the noose”. Dressing for the dance, Tom “glories like spring flowers”. With only a hay rake left, he hitches two horses to “the fine goose-neck horsehair sofa that Liza loves better than anything”, the one Samuel gave her “to rest on before George was born.” “The last I saw,” Samuel says, Tom was going up the hill reclining on it. He tells it with his blue eyes shining and puts his hands on his hips “the better to laugh.” The student says what kept him from stopping it. It feeds the hinge: a man who loves the glory watches it cost his wife the thing she loves best, and a comic story asks the chapter’s question in small. The card must not say what becomes of Tom; the chapter leaves it at “Maybe greatness, maybe the noose”.
Delight. Samuel loves the glory in Tom because it is his own: Liza thinks he is like that, and his eyes shine as he tells it. He would rather lose a sofa than shame a boy who has dressed up for a dance. Like the narrator, he treasures that spirit, cost and all.
Samuel’s blue eyes shone with pleasure.
Liza thinks I’m like that.
Not delight alone. Liza was asleep, and Samuel let the moment pass rather than wake a fight, though he knows what it costs her: “sofa” is “a word of anger and sorrow to Liza.” His laugh carries the doubt he says out loud about Tom. He did not stop the boy because he could not tell which this was, greatness or the noose.
It’s a word of anger and sorrow to Liza.
Maybe greatness, maybe the noose
A strong answer A strong response stands inside Samuel and on the forge pages. One reader says delight kept him still: he loves the glory in Tom because it is his own, his eyes shine as he tells it, and he would rather lose a sofa than shame a boy dressed for a dance. Another says he held back because he could not judge it, letting the sleeping Liza lie and laughing at a spirit he himself calls maybe greatness, maybe the noose. The best answers notice that the chapter lends Tom the word “glories”, and carry Samuel’s doubt into the last question.
1. Adam sees “a sweet and holy girl”. The narrator has called Cathy a monster. He says we understand angels and devils “since we invented them”. Who invented Cathy?
What it asks It asks the student to test both pictures of Cathy against the chapter’s own claim about where angels and devils come from. The narrator writes, “It doesn’t matter that Cathy was what I have called a monster. Perhaps we can’t understand Cathy, but on the other hand we are capable of many things in all directions, of great virtues and great sins.” He imagines “a secret pond” in everyone, a fence most of what grows there cannot climb, and a man whose evil grows strong enough to “wriggle over the fence and swim free”. Then: “It would be absurd if we did not understand both angels and devils, since we invented them.” A paragraph later Adam carries “an image of beauty and tenderness, a sweet and holy girl”. In the hotel, Cathy’s eyes are “as cold as glass” and Dr. Tilson finds “something inhuman about her”; then she says “I’m sorry” and gives him a reason. The student builds a thesis on who invented Cathy, meets the strongest objection, and revises. It feeds the hinge: if only Adam’s Cathy is invented, his glory is blind; if the narrator’s is too, the glory may be no blinder than anyone’s judgment. The card must not say why Cathy tried to end the pregnancy or who fathered the baby, and must not bring in deeds from earlier chapters as if this one showed them.
Adam invented her; the narrator did not. Adam’s Cathy is built of nothing on the page: she says she does not want to go and he does not listen, she gives noncommittal answers and he hears enthusiasm. The narrator’s word is borne out in this very chapter by the needle, the silence, the cold eyes and a doctor who finds something inhuman in her. The monster is not an invention but a report.
She said she did not want to go to California and he did not listen, because his Cathy took his arm and started first.
Her eyes were as cold as glass.
Both did. The narrator says so himself: perhaps we cannot understand Cathy, and we invented devils as surely as angels, out of our own hidden water. The word monster names what we fear in ourselves, as holy girl names what Adam longs for. The chapter shows a woman who is cold, then sad, then smiling up at her husband, and neither picture holds all of her.
Perhaps we can’t understand Cathy, but on the other hand we are capable of many things in all directions, of great virtues and great sins.
Would not such a man be our monster, and are we not related to him in our hidden water?
A strong answer A strong response builds a thesis, meets the strongest objection, and revises. One thesis says Adam invented his Cathy and the narrator did not: Adam’s holy girl is built of nothing on the page, since he does not listen when she says she will not go, while the narrator’s word is borne out by the needle, the cold eyes and a doctor who finds something inhuman in her. The strongest objection is the narrator’s own: perhaps we cannot understand Cathy, and we invented devils as surely as angels, out of our own hidden water. A good revision might hold that Adam invents an angel and the narrator a monster, but only one of them knows he is doing it, and ask what that knowing is worth.
2. Samuel says he can make a world in his mind “as surely as God created this one.” Then he says, “But God saw this world. I’ll never see mine except—this way.” Could Adam say the same of his Cathy?
What it asks It asks the student to set two men’s inner worlds side by side. Samuel’s eyes are “light blue and filled with a young delight”; Louis warns that he is “all full of plans—a hundred plans a day” and “all full of hope”, and that “some of his plans work out.” At the forge Samuel explains the soil, the hard-pan that is “one of the main curses of our valley”, and his dynamite. Then: “I can see myself sitting on my dust heap making a world in my mind as surely as God created this one. But God saw this world. I’ll never see mine except—this way.” He promises a valley that “could feed the world”, falls silent when “A cloud seemed to come over his eyes”, and speaks of “a blackness on this valley”. Adam answers only the bright half, saying Samuel makes it sound “like a good place to settle”. At the blackness he shivers and leaves. The student builds a thesis on whether Adam could say what Samuel says, meets the strongest objection, and revises. It feeds the hinge: if Samuel holds a glory that knows itself, the chapter shows that the glory need not be blind. The card must not say the blackness comes true; here it is a feeling Samuel cannot explain.
No. Samuel knows the world he makes is in his mind: God saw His, and Samuel never will see his. He sees the dark beside the light, the hard-pan, the cloud, the blackness. Adam does not know his Cathy is a picture; the image simply was Cathy to him. Samuel’s glory looks out, and Adam’s looks only at what it lights.
But God saw this world. I’ll never see mine except—this way.
and that image was Cathy to her husband
Nearly. Samuel lives inside his picture too. He can find water nearly everywhere but on his own place, lives on land that Louis says will break a man’s heart, and cannot rest when he knows it could be richer. His hope lets him live there, as Adam’s lets him buy. Samuel says it aloud, but saying it does not make him see further: of the blackness he says, “I don’t know what it is”.
Nearly every place except my own.
Yes, it is, but a man can’t entirely rest when he knows it could be richer.
A strong answer A strong response builds a thesis, meets the strongest objection, and revises. One thesis says Adam could not say it: Samuel knows his world lives in his mind and sees the hard-pan and the blackness beside the riches, while for Adam the image simply was Cathy. The strongest objection is that Samuel lives inside his picture too, finding water everywhere but on his own place and hoping on land that breaks men’s hearts, and that naming the blackness does not help him see it. A good revision might hold that both men are lit by a glory, but only one knows where its light comes from, and weigh how much that knowing protects him.
3. The narrator treasures the kind of glory that came to Adam, yet it keeps Adam from seeing his own wife. Is Adam’s glory a gift or a danger?
What it asks It asks the chapter’s whole question. The narrator opens by praising a glory that lights one mind, “the mother of all creativeness”, and declares that “the free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world”, ending “If the glory can be killed, we are lost.” Then he shows it come to Adam “through Cathy”, says Adam may not have seen her at all, and follows him: past his brother’s pain, across the continent on a broadside’s promise, over every foot of the Sanchez land, past a hotel room where Cathy has nearly bled to death trying to end her pregnancy, to a lobby where he hears only “Your wife is going to have a baby.” At Samuel’s forge he hears of a rich valley and a blackness, struggles all night, and shakes hands with Bordoni. The student builds a thesis, meets the strongest objection, and revises. The card must not say what happens at the birth or how many are born, who fathered the baby, why Cathy really tried to end the pregnancy, or that Samuel’s blackness comes true.
A gift. The narrator sides with it: it released Adam from fear and bitterness after a life of “half-sorrows and sick dissatisfactions”. It makes him generous to his brother, careful with land, liked by the valley, and ready to found a home. Without it he would be Charles, rich without pleasure. The narrator would fight for it: if the glory can be killed, we are lost.
His spirit rose flying and released him from fear and bitterness and rancid memories.
If the glory can be killed, we are lost.
A danger. The same light that frees him blinds him. He does not listen when Cathy says she will not go, does not see his brother’s pain, does not hear her answers about the ranch, and is told a joke about the only good sickness after the knitting needle has gone into the doctor’s pocket. A glory that cannot see the person beside it builds a life on a picture.
And he didn’t listen to her noncommittal answers.
He thought that she linked arms with his enthusiasm.
A strong answer A strong response builds a thesis, meets the strongest objection, and revises. One thesis says the glory is a gift: it frees Adam from fear, bitterness and rancid memories, makes him generous and careful, and is the thing the narrator says he would fight for. The strongest objection is everything it hides: a brother’s pain, a wife who said she did not want to go, and the room upstairs, where the doctor learns what Adam is never told. A good revision might hold that the narrator praises the glory knowing it is blind, and asks the reader to hold both at once. The best answers stay with the page and do not reach past the handshake with Bordoni.
But he went through all the motions of carefulness.The habit of taking care: going slowly, checking, guarding against mistakes. The narrator does not say Adam was careful; he says Adam went through “the motions of carefulness”, the outward steps of it. The word asks whether the care is real or a show the glory puts on while it has already chosen.
In damp places he knelt down and examined the game tracks in the mud, mountain lion and deer, coyote and wild cat, skunk and raccoon, weasel and rabbit, all overlaid with the pattern of quail tracks.Covered with a layer of something else laid over the top, so that what is underneath shows through only in part. The hunters and the hunted are all there in the mud, and the small quail tracks lie over them like a pattern. It is the chapter’s habit in one word: a lighter pattern laid over darker tracks.
And he didn’t listen to her noncommittal answers.Not saying yes or no; giving an answer that promises nothing and shows no opinion. Asked again and again if she likes the ranch, Cathy gives answers like this, and Adam does not listen. The word puts the gap between them in one place: she is keeping herself back, and he hears agreement.
Don’t turn mulish.Stubborn in a sullen, dug-in way, like a mule that will not move. Dr. Tilson uses it for Cathy’s silence. He reads her as an obstinate girl to be scolded into speech, and minutes later as someone to pity; the word shows how quickly he names her, and how little either name may fit.
Adam saw a big man, bearded like a patriarch, his graying hair stirring in the air like thistledown.The light, silky fluff on a thistle’s seeds, which drifts on the slightest breeze. Adam sees a big man with a patriarch’s beard and forge-blackened hands, and yet his hair floats like this. The comparison gives Samuel something light and wandering, fit for a man with a hundred plans a day.
But she’s got brassbound opinions.Fixed and unbending, like a trunk with brass bands round its corners. Louis uses it twice for Liza Hamilton: “No bigger than a bird”, but not to be moved. Beside Samuel, all hope and a hundred plans, it names the other kind of mind in that house: one that holds its ground.