Preview
Discussion Questions
Narration Prompt
Reconstruct the argument of Screwtape's twenty-sixth letter to Wormwood in sequence — the exploiting of the ambiguity in 'Love,' the Philological swap of positive Charity for negative unselfishness, the gendered divergence of meaning, the legislating of self-sacrifice while the enchantment lasts, and the Generous Conflict Illusion. Then state the single corruption you take to organize the letter, and weigh how a counterfeit virtue can do more damage than an openly acknowledged vice.
Discussion Questions
- Screwtape distinguishes Charity, which gives 'that others may be happy in having' a benefit, from unselfishness, which gives 'that he may be unselfish in forgoing' it. When the outward deed is identical, is the moral worth of an act determined chiefly by its visible effect or by the end the agent intends — and what in the letter to Wormwood helps you decide, and why?
- In an earlier letter the devils replaced the descriptive adjective 'unchanged' with the emotional 'stagnant'; here their 'Philological Arm' replaces 'Charity' with 'unselfishness.' Reading the two letters together, is the manipulation of language a minor rhetorical tactic or one of Hell's most fundamental instruments — and why does altering the words available to a culture exert such deep control over what it can think and do? Use details from this letter and the earlier one to Wormwood, and explain why your reading is stronger.
+ 2 more questions in the complete study guide
Critical Thinking
+ 7 more questions in the complete study guide
Get the complete study guide — free
Sign up and get your first book with every chapter included. Copywork, discussion questions, vocabulary, and critical thinking.
Sign up free