Preview
Discussion Questions
Narration Prompt
Summarize the chapter's narrative arc in no more than four sentences. Then identify what you think is the actual argument of the chapter — the claim it is making about how people change — and evaluate whether DiCamillo handles the claim with intellectual honesty.
Discussion Questions
- DiCamillo's refusal to grant interior access to the preacher in this chapter is a significant craft decision. It would have been easy to write a single sentence — 'and as he looked at the dog, he remembered his own lost wife' — that would make the transformation legible. She does not. The chapter delivers a change without ever naming the change. Is this restraint a sign of respect for a character whose inner life DiCamillo wishes to keep private, or is it a technical maneuver to force the reader into active interpretation? And what is the philosophical cost of each reading?
- The chapter turns on a rhetorical structure that is older than rhetoric as a discipline: a petitioner uses the authority figure's own language against him to force the authority figure to live up to his stated values. Kings were reminded of their coronation oaths this way; preachers have long been reminded of their sermons. Opal's deployment of 'less fortunate' is a ten-year-old's version of the same move. Does this make her participation in a venerable rhetorical tradition an act of genuine moral courage, or is it an opportunistic manipulation that the chapter declines to mark as such because marking it would complicate the reader's sympathy?
+ 2 more questions in the complete study guide
Critical Thinking
+ 7 more questions in the complete study guide
Get the complete study guide — free
Sign up and get your first book with every chapter included. Copywork, discussion questions, vocabulary, and critical thinking.
Sign up free